Legal Opinion

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1979No. 7910SC73PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The first question we consider is whether defendants, who were makers of the promissory note but who did not pledge any collateral as security, may raise the one-year statute of limitations under G.S. 1-54(6) as a bar to plaintiff’s action for a deficiency. G.S. 1-54 provides that an action must be brought within one year, “(6) For a deficiency judgment on any debt, promissory note, bond or other evidence of indebtedness after the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust on real estate securing such debt, [or] promissory note. . . .” In the present action the plaintiff bank has…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Stretch v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Raleigh Federal Savings Bank v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. American Foods, Inc. v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. v. BlackwelderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API