Legal Opinion

Jones v. O'Connell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1930No. 12,170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The object of this action by plaintiff O ’Connell against defendant Jones is to recover the amount due on the joint promissory note of Jones and others given to the plaintiff’s assignor. The defendant Jones, against whom judgment went, is here with his writ of error. The spe ciñe objection to this judgment, which both parties say is the controlling question in the case, is that section 6392, C. L. 1921, our six-year statute of limitation, is a bar to the action. The objection below was taken by defendant’s special demurrer, which the trial court overruled, and his affirmative defense in his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. People Ex Rel. Peake v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Hopkins v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Robertson v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Edelstein v. CarlileSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Tucker v. in Death of GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Valenzuela v. MERCY HOSPITAL, DENVER, COLORADOColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. McCowan v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  5. McKinney v. Armco Recreational Products, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API