Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Armco Recreational Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 4, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-A-166PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, Chief Judge.
At issue is defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1985 because of the asserted bar of applicable state statutes of limitations. The federal claims were in addition to alleged violations by defendants of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Related matters leading up to the present controversy have been resolved in previous orders of the Court issued May 4, 1976, and May 21, 1976.
The present difficulty arises from the fact that the Complaint was not filed until February…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Kuckler v. WhislerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Whisler v. KucklerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Johnson v. DodrillDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Estate of DaigleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Fred A. ZUNIGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMFAC FOODS, INC., D/B/A Wilhelm Foods, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & RossDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1979
- Mucci v. Falcon School District 49, El Paso CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jones v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.