Schmidlin v. Alta Planing Mill Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
William Garland, owner of the land, entered into a contract with A. Pantages, to erect thereon a building to be used as a theater, Pantages agreeing to lease this building from the owner. In pursuance of this agreement Garland entered into a contract with the Alta Planing Mill Company, a corporation, to construct the building. This contract called upon the Alta Planing Mill Company to do all of the work in the matter of the construction of the building " excepting the plumbing, heating, ventilation, electrical works, decoration and the fitting up of the stage and elevators, which will be let…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Colgrove v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Hard v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- MacLean v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Smith v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.