Legal Opinion

Maestas v. New Mexico Public Service Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1973No. 9759PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMANUS, Chief Justice.

On June 14, 1971 Southern Union Gas Company (Company) filed an advice notice with the Public Service Commission (Commission) which gave notice to the public and to the Commission of certain revised rate schedules. The purpose of this filing was to propose that the Company’s preferred rule 20 (Adjustment of Rates to Compensate for Changes in Cost of Purchased Gas) should govern the Company’s rate schedules, excepting therefrom seven special contract customers. The rule was properly filed with the Commission and its contents are as follows:(a) The provisions of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. City of Norfolk v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. United Gas Corp. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Young v. Board of PharmacyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Scates v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Behles v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Montana Consumer Counsel v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API