Legal Opinion
Bellum v. Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 29, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.
George A. Bellum (Petitioner), petitions for review from an order of the Office of Attorney General (OAG), sustaining a decision of the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP), denying his application to purchase a firearm. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
On February 25, 1975, Petitioner pled guilty and was convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) pursuant to Section 1037 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code, now repealed. 1 On November 20, 1998, Petitioner applied to purchase a firearm. Pursuant to Section 6111.1(b) of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act, 18…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mark Steven PlaceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- McMullen v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Freeman v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pennsylvania State Police v. GroganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pennsylvania State Police v. HeggenstallerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Zaborowski v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- D.A. Titus v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.