Pennsylvania State Police v. Grogan
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
Herein we must consider the juxtaposition of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act (State Act),3 18 Pa.C.S. § 6101, and the Federal Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g),4 on the civil rights of the citizens *1095of our Commonwealth. We conclude that the position advanced by the Commonwealth, ie., that common pleas court cannot grant a Commonwealth citizen relief from the restrictions imposed by Section 922(g) of the Federal Gun Control Act,5 is without merit. Accordingly, we shall affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Walter Grogan received a driving under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Mark Steven PlaceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Bellum v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SteinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- D.A. Titus v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pennsylvania State Police v. GroganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SwinehartCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003