Martin Et Ux. v. Steen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
David J. Martin and Emma M. Martin, his wife, brought this action in trespass against J. Parke Steen, a contractor, the Conestoga Transportation Company, a street railway company, and the City of Lancaster to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by the wife by reason of falling into a hole in a street in the City of Lancaster as she was about to board a car of the street railway company. The case proceeded to trial, and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ testimony, a nonsuit was entered as to all three defendants. The court subsequently refused a motion to take off…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perret Et Ux. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Stokes v. Township of RalphoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- McCollum v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Gable v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Gerlach Et Ux. v. City of Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Joshmer v. Fred Weber Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Barth Et Vir v. KlinckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Calhoon v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Murtha Et Ux. v. Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937