PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola College
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
The legacy in Maryland land use law of Schultz v. Pritts, 291 Md. 1, 432 A.2d 1319 (1981), has been beneficial and well-applied for the most part over the ensuing years. The synthesis of earlier cases threaded through its reasoning supplies a lucid explanation of the legislative calculus for why some land uses, at the time of original adoption or later amendment of the text of a zoning ordinance, are placed in the blessed category of permitted uses in a zone or zones while other uses in the same zone or zones receive a more measured imprimatur of presumptive compatibility as…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Greater Baden-Aquasco Citizens Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.