Legal Opinion

84 Lumber Co. v. Barkley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1995No. COA94-1133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In granting dismissal of the second action, the trial court ruled that plaintiff’s action was barred because plaintiff failed to refile within one year after plaintiffs previous action had been involuntarily dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). Plaintiff argues that the second action was timely filed because it was filed within the applicable statute of limitations period. After careful review, we reverse and remand.

Under Rule 41(b), a dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits, unless the judge specifies that the dismissal is without prejudice. G.S. §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Clark v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springwall, Inc. v. Timeless Bedding, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
  2. FS Medical Supplies, LLC v. Tanner Pharma UK LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026
  3. FS Medical Supplies, LLC v. TannerGAP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026
  4. Hamilton v. Duke Energy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
  5. Vanek v. Global Supply & Logistics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API