Barak, G. v. Karolizki, E.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:
I. Introduction
Golan Barak filed a lis pendens 1 in the Allegheny County Department of Court Records' judgment index against a certain piece of real estate. 2 In reviewing the lis *212 pendens , the trial court applied the wrong legal test - namely, the standard for a preliminary injunction - and ordered the court clerks to remove the lis pendens from their judgment index. In that same order, the trial court also erroneously directed that the proceeds from a sale of the real estate be placed into escrow pending this litigation's outcome. Mr. Barak appeals that order, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Warehime v. WarehimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Lobos Management v. Powell, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- Estate of A.J.M., Appeal of: Lynch Law GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Iron City Construction v. Westmoreland WoodedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Hanbicki, B. v. Leader, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.