Legal Opinion

Barak, G. v. Karolizki, E.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 2018No. 1672 WDA 2017PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:

I. Introduction

Golan Barak filed a lis pendens 1 in the Allegheny County Department of Court Records' judgment index against a certain piece of real estate. 2 In reviewing the lis *212 pendens , the trial court applied the wrong legal test - namely, the standard for a preliminary injunction - and ordered the court clerks to remove the lis pendens from their judgment index. In that same order, the trial court also erroneously directed that the proceeds from a sale of the real estate be placed into escrow pending this litigation's outcome. Mr. Barak appeals that order, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Warehime v. WarehimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Lobos Management v. Powell, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Estate of A.J.M., Appeal of: Lynch Law GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Iron City Construction v. Westmoreland WoodedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Hanbicki, B. v. Leader, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API