Legal Opinion

Pirtle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1988No. 53959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was found guilty by a jury of exhibiting a weapon in a rude, angry, or threatening manner, a violation of § 571.115, RSMo 1978 (repealed 1981), and sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to a term of nine years’ imprisonment. We affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal in State v. Pirtle, 652 S.W.2d 272 (Mo.App.1983), which recounts the facts of the incident.

In his pro se Rule 27.26 motion, movant alleged, among other matters not germane *378to this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Sweazea v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Horn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API