Legal Opinion
Kern v. Frye Copysystems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1995No. 93 Civ. 0331 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Frye Copysystems, Inc. (“Copysystems”) and Wheelabrator-Frye Co. (“Wheelabrator”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. against William Kern (“Kern”) and Dorothy Kern (collectively the “Kerns”).
For the reasons discussed below, Wheelabrator’s motion with regard to the claims against it for breach of warranty and strict products liability are granted; its motion with respect to the claim of negligence against Copysystems is denied.
The Parties
Copysystems is a manufacturer located in Newburgh, New York. Wheelabrator is its parent…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kittay v. Flutie New York Corp. (In Re Flutie New York Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Van Doren v. Coe Press Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Donovan v. Idant LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Stearns Airport Equipment Co., Inc. v. FMC Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996