Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Penrod Drilling Company

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 18, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-3273PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, District Judge:

By motion for mistrial, one of the defendants in a jury trial raises the issue whether an agreement between the plaintiff and a co-defendant, not revealed to the jury or the moving defendant, to dismiss the co-defendant at the end of the trial, in exchange for the co-defendant’s agreement to offer no resistance to the plaintiff’s case, warrants a new trial.

Vernon Daniel, a Jones Act employee of Penrod, sued his employer for injuries sustained aboard a crew boat while en route to an offshore location. Pen-rod had contracted to perform offshore services for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lum v. StinnettNevada Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Ronnie Gene Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., Third-Party v. Crown Rig Building Services, Inc., and Branham Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Burkett v. Crulo Trucking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Champion v. Panel Era Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API