Legal Opinion

Lum v. Stinnett

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1971No. 6220PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

This appeal arises from a malpractice action commenced by respondent against three physicians: Dr. Greene, who attended respondent at a hospital emergency room; Dr. Romeo, respondent’s “family doctor,” who consulted with Greene by telephone, directed that respondent be X-rayed, and thereafter attended him; and appellant Lum, who “read” the X-rays. Respondent’s theory was that defendants negligently failed to detect and treat a compression fracture in respondent’s spine. Issues dispositive of this appeal concern the propriety and effect of an agreement by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Klotz v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Klotz v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Kenrich Corp. Ex Rel. Kline v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API