Lum v. Stinnett
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
This appeal arises from a malpractice action commenced by respondent against three physicians: Dr. Greene, who attended respondent at a hospital emergency room; Dr. Romeo, respondent’s “family doctor,” who consulted with Greene by telephone, directed that respondent be X-rayed, and thereafter attended him; and appellant Lum, who “read” the X-rays. Respondent’s theory was that defendants negligently failed to detect and treat a compression fracture in respondent’s spine. Issues dispositive of this appeal concern the propriety and effect of an agreement by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Klotz v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Klotz v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kenrich Corp. Ex Rel. Kline v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.