Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Conkle v. Sadler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 2002-2190PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In July 2001, Applied Performance Technologies, Inc. (“APT”) filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. APT claimed that appellant Eric Conkle, a former employee, had breached a noncompetition agreement. APT sought damages and injunctive relief against Conkle. Conkle retained the law firm of Ferron & Associates, L.P.A., and appellant attorney John W. Ferron to represent him in the APT lawsuit. Appellee Judge Lisa L. Sadler, then with the common pleas court,1 was assigned to preside over the case.

{¶ 2} On July 30, 2001, upon agreement of the parties in the APT case,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Downs v. PaniotoOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Florence v. ZitterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Buck v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Douglas v. BurlewOhio Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API