Legal Opinion

Segal v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 So.2d 496 (1953)

SEGAL

v.

CITY OF MIAMI.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

February 6, 1953.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1953.

Helliwell, Clark & Guilmartin, Miami, for appellant.

John E. Cicero and Olavi M. Hendrickson, Miami, for appellee.

WARREN, Associate Justice.

The appellant is the owner of nine contiguous lots lying along and on the east side of Northwest 27th Avenue in the city of Miami, and of four contiguous lots lying along and on the west side of Northwest 26th Avenue; all of the lots are in the same block and the rear of the four lots adjoins the rear of a portion of the nine lots.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Forde v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Skillman v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Ex Parte WiseSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. LachmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. City of Miami Beach v. PrevattSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Oka v. ColeSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  4. Clarke v. Di DioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Garlick v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API