Oka v. Cole
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
145 So.2d 233 (1962)
Kenneth OKA et al., Petitioners,
v.
Albert COLE et al., Respondents.
No. 31598.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 27, 1962.
Rehearing Denied October 23, 1962.
Joseph A. Wanick, Miami Beach, for petitioners.
Morris Berick, Miami Beach, for respondents.
DREW, Justice.
Petitioners assert that the district court's decision[1] in this case conflicts with numerous decisions of this Court establishing the rule that a municipal zoning regulation or ruling will not be judicially stricken when its reasonableness or validity is fairly debatable. City of Miami Beach v. Ocean & Inland Co., 147 Fla.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. PopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Forde v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burritt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Willdel Realty, Inc. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Miles v. DADE COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Mailman Development Corp. v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.