Legal Opinion

Garlick v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 6, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, Justice.

The purpose of this litigation was to secure relief against certain zoning restrictions in the City of Miami. On final hearing the chancellor denied relief sought and dismissed the bill of complaint. The plaintiff appealed. It appears that the City Planning Board approved removing the zoning restrictions but the City Commission denied the recommendation of the Planning Board and the chancellor agreed with the City Commission.

The real point in the case is whether it is controlled by Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 146 Fla. 676, 1 So.2d 642; City of Miami Beach v. First Trust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forde v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. City of Miami Beach v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. City of Miami Beach v. ELSALTO REAL ESTATESupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Segal v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Elwyn v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Green v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API