Legal Opinion

Melman Fruit Co. v. Melman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1932No. 41280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

We have to consider first a medley of controversy over "questions of practice and procedure in this court. The appellant took its appeal and filed its abstract in due course. All its procedure was apparently in due form. The appellees thereupon filed a purported “Denial of Abstract”. This denial challenged the existence of any record in the district court in support of the abstract. At the same time the appellees filed a motion to strike from the appellant’s abstract all the purported evidence on the ground set forth in its “Denial of Abstract”. They supported their motion with certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Ottumwa v. McCarthy Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Finley v. ThorneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Andrew v. Farmers Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. LevisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Tessman v. TessmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API