Legal Opinion
Kelsey v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 1, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The plaintiff, Amber Kelsey, brings this action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as amended, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”), against the District of Columbia. See Compl. at 1, ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees (“PL’s Mot.”), ECF No. 48. The Magistrate Judge to whom this motion was randomly referred submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part, see Report and Recommendation, Oct. 7, 2016, 2015 (“R & R”), ECF -No. 53, and the plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McNeil v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- James v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Radtke v. CaschettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bond v. Friendship Public Charter School Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- James v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.