Legal Opinion
McNeil v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Jaden McNeil, Patrick Cana-van, and Daniel McNeil (“Plaintiffs”) successfully established through an administrative proceeding that the District of Columbia Public Schools (“the District”) failed to provide Jaden McNeil with a free and appropriate public education in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.. After the success of their administrative…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cox v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- James v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Merrick v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Shaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.