Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kirwan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth has appealed from an order granting Robert J. Kirwan, II’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It claims that the lower court erred for three reasons:

1. It presented a prima facie case, so habeas corpus was improper;

2. The trial court should not have sustained the complaining witnesses’ assertion of their Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination based solely on counsel’s representation that they were claiming the privilege; and

3. The evidentiary record was insufficient to permit the privilege.

¶ 2 Construing all the evidence in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EmlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Com. v. Wroten, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Commonwealth v. TreatSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. DoolinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Com. v. MolinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API