Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Treat

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

¶ 1 After being charged with harassment1 following a domestic dispute, Donald B. Treat filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. At the habeas corpus hearing, when the Commonwealth asked the alleged victim what she was doing at the time of the incident, the victim replied, “Well, I plead the 5th. I really don’t want to testify.” (N.T., 3/19/03 at 5.) Over the Commonwealth’s objection, the trial court sustained her claim of privilege and granted habeas corpus relief. We reverse.

¶ 2 On appeal, the Commonwealth raises two interrelated issues:

1. Whether the trial court improperly allowed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. John A. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RashidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. DoolinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. v. MolinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Com. v. Minor, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Moore, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API