Legal Opinion

Joseph Michael Lacaze, and Douglas Arceneaux v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1972No. 28964PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

In this appeal from a § 2255 proceeding Appellants claim that they were denied the rights afforded them under the then governing Rule 7(11) of the Local Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit1 because their counsel neither advised them of their right to seek Supreme Court review nor initiated a timely petition for certiorari.

A review of the record leads us to conclude that Appellants have misplaced their reliance on our former Rule 7(11), as they were represented by their own retained counsel at their trial on the merits and during their…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Taglianetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. García Troncoso v. Administración del Derecho al TrabajoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  2. United States v. Silas JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. David L. Mack v. William French Smith, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Thomas Robert Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Herbert AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API