Legal Opinion

Burger v. Blair Medical Associates, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 Blair Medical Associates appeals from the April 24, 2006, judgment entered following the denial of their Motion for Post-Trial Relief. Judgment was entered in favor of Natasha Karanjia, D.O. on June 12, 2006; she did not file an appeal in this matter.

¶ 2 Appellee, Diana Burger, commenced this action by filing a complaint on December 24, 2001, averring, inter alia, that she had treated with Karanjia and Blair Medical for a work-related injury from 1996 until 2001. Record, No. 7. The complaint stated appellee had signed a medical authorization to permit Healthforce,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burger v. Blair Medical Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. AFL PHILADELPHIA LLC v. KrauseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Taha v. Bucks County PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Dunbar v. Rivello, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API