Cho Hung Bank v. Kim (In Re Kim)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:
I
The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a nondischargeability action under Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) Section 523(a)(2) on the basis that the plaintiff had not advanced additional funds in connection with the extension or renewal of credit.
We REVERSE and REMAND.
II
FACTS
The appellant, Cho Hung Bank (“Bank”), held a junior lien on real property located in Glendale, California (“Property”). Apparently the owner of the Property filed for bankruptcy sometime in 1987. In October of 1987 a senior lienholder obtained relief from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,355 in Re Robert Britton, Debtor. Robert Britton v. Mary PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re HassanallyUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Miserandino v. Resort Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Duplessis v. Valenti (In Re Valenti)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Burbank v. Capelli (In Re Capelli)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Locke v. United States Trustee (In Re Locke)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.