Legal Opinion

Brinkos Et Ux. v. McKeesport City

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1939No. Appeal, 118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action in trespass is by a husband and wife against the defendant to recover for injuries sustained by the wife-plaintiff.

Mulberry Street, in the city of McKeesport, is twenty-five feet wide and is without sidewalks. Mrs. Brinkos, on the morning of May 27, 1932, went to O. H. Gisser’s grocery store, which abuts on that street. To enter the store it was necessary to use two steps extending up from and out on the street. Workmen were engaged in repairing the cartway and, in removing the bricks from under the steps, they loosened the lower one, which had been fastened…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Lawrence v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Greene v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Davis v. Shenandoah BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stewart Et Vir v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. D'Annunzio v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Braden v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API