Legal Opinion

D'Annunzio v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1940No. Appeal, 317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action in trespass to recover damages for injuries as the result of a fall occasioned by a defective sidewalk, alleging negligence on the part of defendants. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The learned court below granted defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict upon the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. From the judgment entered plaintiff has appealed.

The only matter for review is the granting of defendants’ motions. In this situation the familiar rule requires that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Hawk v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Llewellyn v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Graham v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Davis v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eisner v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burk v. Artesian Water Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Petruski Et Vir. v. Duquesne CitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Carton Et Vir. v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Eisner v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API