Legal Opinion

Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1902No. 4115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the District Court of Lake Cotmty.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

The plaintiff in error (defendant below) owns four lode mining claims, situate in Lake county, called the Capital, Clipper, Congress and Castle lodes, and the defendants in error (plaintiffs below) own the Searl placer mining claim, within the boundaries of which these lode claims are located. The present controversy relates to the territory thus in conflict. The placer was the prior location, and was made in the year 1877. The plaintiff in error having made application in the land office for patent of its lode mines, the defendants in error filed therein an adverse claim, and within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. Calhoun Gold Mining Co. v. Ajax Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Mt. Rosa Mining, Milling & Land Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. ImmelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Fisher v. Pioneer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  3. Couch v. CliftonColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Excelsior Iron Min. Co. v. JustheimUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co. v. HuppeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API