Legal Opinion

Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co. v. Huppe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1915No. 8297Published

Error to Boulder District Court. Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.

Plaintiff claimed in the court below that the twenty-three reservoirs involved herein, of defendants in error, were not entitled to storage priorities, and moved to exclude them from the recommended and final decree, upon the ground that they had made no direct independent appropriation from the river for storage, but had only stored the ditch water diverted from the river by the ditches, upon their decreed ditch appropriations, and it asked that the claims filed by the claimants of these reservoirs, defendants in error, be dismissed out of court. This motion was…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Colorado Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Orman & Crook v. Ryan Bros.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Lamar Canal Co. v. Amity Land & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Nix v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API