Legal Opinion
Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Board of Education of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 17, 1936No. 14687PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, District Judge.
By this suit plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants, the board of education of the city of Chicago, the city of Chicago, and certain officers of the board of education and of the city from paying out any money now in the hands of the city treasurer of the city of Chicago arising from the proceeds of taxes extended for educational and building purposes upon the tax levy for 1929, except on a pro rata basis, to the owners and holders of tax anticipation warrants who have-not been paid either principal or accrued interest on warrants issued against the educational and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cross v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South East National Bank v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- In Re Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett County, Ark.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1937
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Board of Education of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939