Van Dyke v. Doughty
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Wayne; Hally, J. Petition by William Van Dyke to secure an order compelling certain witnesses, Alfred J. Doughty and others, to give testimony under letters rogatory issued by the district court of Polk county, Iowa. An order requiring the witnesses to answer is reviewed by them on writ of certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In the district court of the county of Polk, State of Iowa, Oomptograph Company, as plaintiff, began a suit at law against Burroughs Adding Machine Company, defendant. Out of and under the seal of that court, letters rogatory were issued'to William Van Dyke, a notary public for the county of Wayne, State of Michigan, to examine on their corporeal oath or affirmation Al-van Macauley, Joseph Boyer, and Alfred J. Doughty upon interrogatories accompanying the said letters and to certify, seal up, and forward the same to the clerk of said county. The statute of this State (3 Comp. Laws, § 10138, 5…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re MerkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Uline v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Brown v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carroll v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Comptograph Co. v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Bettendorf v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. McAdooCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1965
- In Re Motor Truck Transp. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.