Legal Opinion

Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided March 30, 2004No. 1:00 CV 01247PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Radian Guaranty Incorporated and Amerin Guaranty Corporation’s (collectively “Radian” or “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [Document # 27] Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (hereinafter “Second Motion to Dismiss”). Plaintiffs Richard C. Mullinax, Jr., Perry Pike, and Joseph and Verda Adams (collectively “Plaintiffs” 1 ) have alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2617. (Am. Compl. [Doc. # 26] ¶¶ 1-2.) In particular, Plaintiffs claim relief under § 2607 of that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  3. Robinson v. Fountainhead Title Group Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. In Re CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re Title Insurance Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API