Legal Opinion

State v. Cockerham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1998No. COA97-650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-49(a), a defendant may be charged with willfully and maliciously injuring another by use of an explosive or incendiary device if there is at least “some probability” that the subject device, compound, formulation or substance was capable of being used for destructive, explosive or incendiary purposes. See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-50.1. Because there was “some probability” under the circumstances of this case that defendant planned to use the gasoline thrown on his victim as an explosive or incendiary device, we uphold his conviction for violating N.C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Lamar Burns-JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. State v. GayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. GRAHAM, JR.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  5. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API