Legal Opinion
Public Water Supply District No. 10 of Cass County, Missouri v. City of Peculiar, Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 3, 2003No. 03-1685PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Public Water Supply District No. 10 (the “District”) seeks a declaratory judgment alleging that the City of Peculiar (the “City”) is illegally acting to dissolve the District, under Missouri Rev. Stat. § 247.220, in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b). It also seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising from any curtailment or limitation of its rights to sell water within its territory as a result of the City’s illegal competition.
In the district court, the City moved to dismiss on two grounds: 1) that the District’s Complaint failed to state a claim because § 1926(b) is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Rural Wtr Dist No 2 Creek Cnty v. City of GlenpoolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Morgan v. McCotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Telescope Media Group v. Rebecca LuceroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.