Legal Opinion

Lynchburg Milling Co. v. National Exchange Bank

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The plaintiff in error, the Lynchburg Milling Company, brought an action of assumpsit against the White and Bumsey Grain Company of Chicago, Illinois, for the recovery of $550, at the same time issuing an ancillary attachment and designating the defendant in error, the National Exchange Bank of Lynchburg, Virginia, as being indebted to and having effects of the defendant in its possession.

The Exchange Bank answered, denying the suggestion, but stated by way of explanation that it had received from and on account of the Continental National Bank of Chicago a draft drawn by the defendant, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Oeters v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Fourth National Bank of Montgomery v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Meade v. MeadeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. SunTrust Bank v. PS Bus. Parks, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  5. Greensburg National Bank v. C. Syer & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API