Legal Opinion
State v. Nodes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1995No. C8-95-896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A defendant criminally charged with a second violation of a harassment restraining order moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting that the guardian who obtained the order on behalf of her ward lacked standing. The district court denied the motion and certified the issue to this court as important and doubtful. We affirm the denial of the motion to dismiss and answer the certified question in the affirmative.
FACTS
In June 1994 Lorraine Kolp obtained a harassment restraining order under Minn. Stat. § 609.748, subd. 2. She obtained the order as guardian and on behalf of her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nussbaumer v. FetrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. MirelesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Davis v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. Wohlsol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003