Legal Opinion

Davis v. Danielson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1997No. C7-96-1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Michael Jackson Davis and Priscilla Gail Pope appeal from a judgment dismissing their action to enjoin the enforcement of a restraining order issued against them by respondent Hennepin County District Court Judge Andrew W. Danielson, arguing the district court erred in holding the action was an impermissible collateral attack on Judge Danielson’s order. We affirm.

PACTS

Davis and Pope are pro se plaintiffs in litigation with Group Health Plan, Inc. During that litigation, Davis and Pope directly contacted employees of Group Health to obtain medical records and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. NodesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Diana Delgado v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Lesner v. Liquid Disposal, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API