Brach v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the motion of the United States (“government” or “defendant”) to dismiss the pro se complaint of the plaintiff, Ernesto Brach (“Mr.Brach”), pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 In the alternative, the government moves for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that the doctrine of res judicata bars the plaintiffs complaint. In his complaint, the plaintiff alleges that his tax refund claim was erroneously denied as untimely…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Mendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Brady v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.