Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gold Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1944No. Appeals, 209, 210 and 216PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Sam Gold was charged in an indictment with larceny and receiving, and his wife, Betty Gold, in a separate indictment, with receiving the following personal property: one Spartan fan, one Silex coffee maker and certain other electrical appliances belonging to Joseph Gold, trading and doing business as the Liberty Incandescent Supply Company. A third indictment charged both defendants with the larceny and receiving of one Emerson radio and one lady’s white gold diamond ring, belonging to one Nellie Reiter.

The jury found the defendants guilty on the first two indictments and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Commonwealth v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. PugliseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. MaybeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. GibbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. CohanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API