Commonwealth v. Maybee
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
It has long been, fundamental to the criminal jurisprudence of this Commonwealth that a necessary predicate to any conviction is proof of the corpus delicti, i.e., the occurrence of an injury or loss and someone’s criminality as the source of this injury or loss.. See Commonwealth v. Burns, 409 Pa. 619, 627, 187 A. 2d 552, 556-57 (1963); Commonwealth v. Turza, 340 Pa. 128, 133, 16 A. 2d 401, 404 (1940). Although the corpus delicti may be proven by circumstantial evidence, see Commonwealth v. Homeyer, 373 Pa. 150, 94 A. 2d 743 (1953); Commonwealth v. Gardner, 282…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. HomeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Buchanan v. VerbonitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.