Legal Opinion
Samson v. City of Bainbridge Island
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 24, 2009No. 34780-6-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*39¶1 Kelly and Sally Samson and Robert and Joanne Hacker (collectively Samson) appeal the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board’s (Board) decision to affirm the city of Bainbridge Island’s (City) amendment to the City’s shoreline master program (SMP), allowing the City to prohibit construction of new single-use private docks and to limit dock construction in Blakely Harbor to two joint-use docks, one community dock, floats, and buoys.
Bridgewater, J.
¶2 We hold that the Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) proposed guidelines, which were not in effect when the City forwarded its…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kelly Samson v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Olympic Stewardship Foundation v. Environmental & Land Use Hearings Office Ex Rel. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1384 v. Kitsap TransitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Chelan Basin Conservancy v. GBI Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- May v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.