Legal Opinion

Downey v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The court below dismissed plaintiff’s action for judgment declaring that defendant is legally obligated to defend her and is liable to pay any judgment which Mary Saracina and husband may recover against her in the negligence action they have brought against plaintiff and the City of Buffalo. It appears that plaintiff’s husband was employed by the City of Buffalo and had the use of one of its automobiles upon its business. He permitted the plaintiff to drive it on July 29,1965, and while doing so she was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by Mary Saracina, who then, with her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Stuyvesant Insurance v. PerfettoNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rimar v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LauriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. City of Rochester v. Vanderlinde Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Belmer v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gessin v. Throne-HolstNew York Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API