Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant Insurance v. Perfetto

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester Holtzman, J.

Motion by defendant De Louise to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that (1) it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, (2) there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause and (3) this is not a proper case for a declaratory judgment.

Plainly, there is no other action pending between the same parties for the same cause. In the first place, plaintiff in this action is not a party to the other action. In the second place, the other action is one by this defendant De Louise against Bilella, Perfetto and Hempstead Lincoln-Mercury Motors Corp.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. Beers Chevrolet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Downey v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Mas v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stuyvesant Insurance v. PerfettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Colon v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Colon v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API