Legal Opinion
Belmer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Plaintiff herein, the defendant driver in the underlying negligence action, seeks a summary declaration (CPLR 3212) adjudging the defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter Nationwide) liable for defense costs in the underlying action. Third-party defendant, Reliance Insurance Company (hereinafter Reliance), cross-moves for an order granting summary judgment.
Defendant Fiorito was the owner of the vehicle which struck a pedestrian. Fiorito had previously delivered her automobile to defendant Monte Carlo Auto Repair, Inc. (hereinafter Monte…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Colon v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- PHICO Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Farmington Casualty Co. v. United Educators Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999