Legal Opinion
Seaborn Health Care, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 29, 2011No. Nos. 11-489C, 11-500CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
WHEELER, Judge.
In this post-award bid protest, two disappointed offerors, Seaborn Health Care, Inc. (“Seaborn”) and Top Echelon Contracting, Inc. (“Top Echelon”), challenge a Blanket Purchase Agreement (“BPA”) awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) to Teamstaff Government Solutions, Inc. (“Teamstaff’). The BPA is for pharmacist and pharmacy technician staffing services at seven VA mail order pharmacy facilities in the United States. The VA conducted the procurement as a Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) purchase under Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAlR”)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Glenn Defense Marine (Asia), PTE Ltd. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- J.C.N. Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Firstline Transportation Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.