Legal Opinion

State v. Grimmett

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 4, 1990No. C7-90-1194PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Mike Grimmett is charged with first degree criminal sexual conduct. In a pretrial ruling, the court excluded the testimony of the complainant because it was tainted by hypnosis. The state appeals the ruling and we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

According to the criminal complaint, police encountered the complainant after responding to a report that an intoxicated woman was walking along Highway 71, south of Park Rapids, Minnesota. The woman informed the police that she had been raped and showed them a folding buck knife which she said had been used in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API