Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Quintana Petroleum Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1939No. 7634PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Smedley

of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the Court.

The State of Texas filed this suit against plaintiff in error Thomas O’Connor in Refugio County for the recovery of state and county ad valorem taxes, together with interest and penalties, due for the year 1936 on account of his alleged ownership of an interest in the oil, gas and other minerals in 4000 acres of land in Refugio County and for foreclosure of lien. The petition describes the property as being a mineral interest reserved by O’Connor in an oil and gas lease of said land executed by him to Quintana…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Tennant v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Sheppard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Retamco Operating, Inc. v. Republic Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. WhittenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Haile v. HoltzclawTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Brown v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API