Legal Opinion

State v. Whittenburg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1954No. A-4281PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

This suit was instituted by petitioner, the state of Texas, in behalf of itself, Yoakum County, and political subdivisions of the county, against respondents, J. A. Whittenburg, Jr., and others, for the collection of ad valorem taxes for the years 1942 to 1949 inclusive, alleged to be due and unpaid on account of respondents’ ownership of mineral interests, referred to herein as oil payments, in three sections of land in Yoakum County. The trial court granted petitioner’s motion for instructed verdict and rendered judgment for petitioner against respondents, J. A. Whittenburg, Jr., and Roy R.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rowland v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sam Bassett Lumber Co. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Druesdow v. BakerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. State Mortgage Corp. v. LudwigTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Baker v. DruesedowSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Arlington v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Whelan v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Enron Corp. v. Spring Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Davis v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1982

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API